The issue emerged when a CIDCO housing lottery winner filed a complaint regarding deviations in the project located near Kharghar railway station.
The buyer alleged that
Key features promised during the lottery phase were later altered
Project specifications did not match the original advertisement
2. Cut in Number of Lifts
Original plan: 4 passenger lifts
Revised plan: 2 lifts only
3. Carpet Area Mismatch
Revised (RERA-compliant): 508 sq ft
MahaRERA’s Stand on the Issue
Developers and authorities must deliver what is promised
Transparency is non-negotiable under RERA regulations
Why This Case Matters for Homebuyers
1. Trust in Government Housing Schemes
Affordable housing
Government-backed credibility
RERA-approved developments
CIDCO’s Response: Why Were Changes Made?
CIDCO defended the changes by citing regulatory and environmental constraints:
Some amenities fell within Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) areas near mangroves, where construction is restricted
Building design was modified as per National Building Code (NBC)
Height and structural changes led to fewer lifts and revised layouts
These adjustments, according to CIDCO, were necessary to comply with legal norms.
MahaRERA’s Stand on the Issue
MahaRERA has emphasized that:
Developers and authorities must deliver what is promised
Any changes must be clearly communicated to buyers
Transparency is non-negotiable under RERA regulations
Why This Case Matters for Homebuyers
Affordable housing
Government-backed credibility
RERA-approved developments
2. Impact on Affordable Housing Buyers
Most CIDCO buyers belong to:
Economically Weaker Sections (EWS)
Low-Income Groups (LIG)
For them, even a small reduction in:
Carpet area
Conclusion
The MahaRERA vs CIDCO Kharghar case is a wake-up call for the real estate sector, especially in affordable housing.While government-backed schemes offer accessibility, buyers must stay vigilant. Even small deviations in carpet area or amenities can significantly impact the value of a home.
Trending News In Real Estate